Federal Energy Efficient Product Procurement

By running more efficient lighting, appliances and equipment, federal agencies can cut energy costs, devote more resources to their core missions and operate more sustainably. Meeting these economic and environmental challenges often comes down to what products we buy. Federal agencies have been encouraged or required to buy energy efficient products since the 1970s. Berkeley Lab’s Sustainable Operations (SO) Group studies the dynamics of markets for clean energy technologies, aids federal agencies in meeting their requirements and quantifies the impacts of those procurements.

Our research focuses on: 

  • Strategies for enhancing uptake of energy efficient products in the public sector
  • Pathways and barriers to increasing compliance with federal procurement mandates
  • Economic and environmental impacts of purchasing energy efficient products

Learn more about our work and the federal government's pursuit of greater energy efficiency: Image of energy consuming appliances in cardboard box

 

Background 

For 30 years, Berkeley Lab and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) have worked to increase federal procurement of energy-efficient technologies. In aggregate, the federal government is the largest U.S. purchaser of energy consuming products, with 650,000 vehicles, 350,000 buildings, and a $6 billion annual utility bill. It thus represents large potential for cost savings, reduction of environmental impacts and influence over the availability and price of efficient products for households and businesses. In a recent study, we found that full compliance with federal requirements for buying energy efficient products would achieve more than $300 million dollars in energy savings annually and avoid roughly a million tons of CO2e emissions.

Image 3

The SO Group works with the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) to realize those savings by addressing the challenges that federal agencies face in procuring energy efficient products. We educate and assist federal agencies with market assessments, training, impact evaluations and direct technical support. We also review solicitations for energy consuming products, one of the primary methods by which the federal government can address climate change, to track progress in compliance with federal purchasing requirements.

 

Federal Purchasing Requirements

Image 1When buying energy-consuming products and services, federal agencies are required by law to buy products that are energy efficient. These laws include statutory requirement 42 USC 8259b and federal acquisition regulations, most recently FAR Clause 52.223-15.  They require agencies to purchase energy-consuming products that bear the ENERGY STAR label or are designated by DOE’s Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) as being in the upper 25% of energy performance among similar products.

These laws and regulations date back to the energy crisis of the 1970s. Congress has strengthened those mandates over the decades, and the executive branch has reinforced and provided guidance on achieving those mandates through regulations and executive orders (EOs), most recently EO 14057 on Catalyzing Clean Energy and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability. This recent guidance builds on previous measures to address federal sector emissions through EO 13990 on Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis and EO 14008 on Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad.

Through EO 13990, President Joseph R. Biden Jr. prompted federal agencies to revise federal regulations to better align with environmental protection, greenhouse gas reduction and environmental justice goals. With EO 14008, President Biden additionally put forward a policy spurring a government-wide approach to combat the climate crisis, requiring agencies to develop and implement action plans for facilitating water and energy efficiency through procurement.

With EO 14057, President Biden ordered federal agencies to lead the fight against climate change by example, “catalyze private sector investment and expand the economy and American industry by transforming how we build, buy, and manage electricity, vehicles, buildings, and other operations to be clean and sustainable.”

EO 14057 requires federal agencies to reduce procurement emissions to net-zero by 2050 through the following actions:

  • Purchase products that contain recycled products, are biobased, or are energy and water efficient, in accordance with relevant statutory requirements
  • Maximize environmental benefits and cost effectiveness of procurement by basing “best value” determinations on full life-cycle costs 
  • To the maximum extent practicable, purchase sustainable products and services identified or recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency
  • Ensure compliance and alignment of internal policies, procedures and training with government-wide sustainable procurement policy

Key legal authorities and associated federal and Berkeley Lab responses are illustrated in the timeline below.

Presentation 1

Purchasing Support Tools

Our resources and tools help federal and state agencies meet energy efficiency purchasing requirements. We provide:

Pasted Image

Contact team members below by email or reach out to the group directly for any program-related questions at SustainableOps@lbl.gov

Solicitation Reviews

When a federal agency wants to buy a specific product or service, the agency issues a solicitation with specific requirements for businesses bidding for the contract. The SO Group reviews federal solicitations annually to assess compliance and identify obstacles with purchasing energy efficient products. Our reviews focus on solicitation language that requests energy efficient products. At a minimum, that language should cite FAR Clause 52.223-15, which requires the purchase of those products. We conduct both automated and manual reviews of federal solicitations and classify compliance as shown below. 

This image shows that effective compliant solicitations are a subset of FAR compliant solicitations on the left side. On the right side, there is a decision tree showing that when a solicitation does not meet the requirements of FAR clause 52.223-15, the solicitation is non-compliant. When it does meet the FAR clause requirements it is considered a compliant solicitation. Compliant solicitations that do not include additional energy efficiency specifications or language are considered FAR compliant, while those that do include additional energy efficiency specifications or language are considered effective compliant.

We review solicitations for all energy-consuming products and categorize them as either non-compliant or compliant. Non-compliant solicitations do not mention energy efficiency or efficiency requirements Compliant solicitations can be further divided into FAR compliant and effective compliant. FAR compliant solicitations only include FAR clause 52.223-15 and no additional energy efficiency requirements or specifications. Effective compliant solicitations are more explicit and more likely to result in purchases of energy efficient products. 

Federal agency compliance rates for meeting requirements on purchasing energy efficient products vary both among, and within federal agencies. The graph below shows the number of compliant solicitations differs among departments.

Graph of federal agency compliance rates from FY2015 to FY2022

Offices within departments had a high level of variability in compliance. The chart below shows compliance rates for 10 federal offices that issue the most solicitations.

Graph of compliance rates for top ten offices that put out the most solicitations

Federal compliance rates also vary by the nature of the contracting arrangement. The graph below shows compliance rates from FY15 to FY22 for direct and indirect solicitations. Direct solicitations (blue) are federal requests for vendors to bid on supplying specific products to the government. With indirect solicitations (purple), a contractor is empowered to decide what products to acquire on behalf of the government (e.g., through a maintenance contract). The government remains the ultimate customer for the energy-using products and pays the energy bill, so the requirement to buy energy-efficient products holds in both direct and indirect solicitations.

Graph of compliance for direct versus indirect solicitations from FY2015 to FY2022

Our reviews indicate that federal agencies sometimes overlook or otherwise miss opportunities to include language that specifies energy efficient products in indirect solicitations, hence the comparatively lower compliance rates for indirect solicitations shown in the graph. Increasing compliance rates could create an opportunity for substantial energy savings since indirect solicitations constitute more than half of the solicitations reviewed between 2015-2022.

Although compliance rates vary depending on agency, office and type of solicitation, average FAR compliance has increased 12% and effective compliance has increased by 10% over the last seven years. Annual updates to this review help us to better understand the effectiveness of policy changes, training and resources to support energy efficient procurement.

Impact Evaluation 

EEPP

 

Berkeley Lab has published multiple studies reporting significant energy cost savings and GHG emission reductions the federal government can achieve by complying with energy efficiency requirements. The latest analysis by the SO Group estimates that by fully complying with energy efficiency purchasing requirements, the federal government can see overall operational cost savings of about $310 million and 1.3 million CO2 equivalent metric tons of emissions saved every year.

Chart

Since the start of the century, the federal government could have saved $4.8B by fully complying with federal energy efficient purchasing requirements. The SO Group will continue to work to evaluate the impact energy efficient product procurement can have within the federal government in the coming years. 

Publications

The SO Group has contributed a large collection of studies, reports, and training around energy efficient product procurement. Many of our resources are intended for federal agencies but can be applicable to other public and private organizations.

Identifying Institutional Barriers and Policy Implications for Sustainable Energy Technology Adoption Among Large Organizations in California (2020).

This exploratory study looks to better understand the processes through which large organizations purchase sustainable energy technologies and what challenges they experience during that process.

Wang, LiyangMolly MorabitoChristopher T Payne, and Gerald Robinson"Identifying institutional barriers and policy implications for sustainable energy technology adoption among large organizations in California." Energy Policy 146 (2020) 111768. DOI

Messaging for Impact: Behavioral Science-Based Communication Strategies to Advance Energy Efficiency (2020).

In this behavioral study, we measure the effectiveness of various communication strategies by measuring responses to different messages in our digital communications. 

Chalasani, SravanClayton JohnsonMolly MorabitoAlexander NewkirkLiyang WangIan M Hoffman, and Christopher T Payne"Messaging for Impact: Behavioral Science-Based Communication Strategies to Advance Energy Efficiency." ACEEE 2020 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. 2020. DOI

Contracting for Efficiency: A Best Practices Guide for Energy-Efficient Product Procurement (2019).

A best practices guide for federal agencies and others on how to include energy efficiency requirements in contracting language. This guide explains the benefits of purchasing efficient equipment, provides a list of covered product categories, and provides in-depth sample contract language. 

Murrel, Jeff and Christopher T. Payne“Contracting for Efficiency: A Best Practices Guide for Energy-Efficient Product Procurement”Federal Energy Management Program. 2019.

Changing Institutional Procurement Behavior to Achieve Energy Savings (2018).

Statutes and regulations require federal purchasing of energy-efficient products, yet federal buyers do not typically request energy-efficient products when making purchases. This paper analyzes the impact of efforts by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) to increase compliance with those requirements. 

Wang, Liyang, and Christopher T Payne"Changing Institutional Procurement Behavior to Achieve Energy Savings." 2018 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Pacific Grove, CA, 2018. LBNL-2001182. DOI PDF

Lighting Energy Efficiency: Update and Impacts (2017).

This paper documents the methodology used to develop the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) lighting efficiency requirements for the 2017 FEMP lighting update. This methodology for calculating the total benefits presented goes beyond site energy saved, and includes full fuel cycle energy savings, energy cost savings, emissions offset and monetized emissions costs. 

Siap, DavidChristopher T Payne, and Alex Lekov"The United States Federal Energy Management Program lighting energy efficiency 2017 update and impacts." Applied Energy 233-234 (2018) 99 - 104. DOI PDF

From Policy to Compliance: Federal Energy Efficient Product Procurement (2015).

This report analyzes federal agency compliance with energy efficient product procurement requirements.

Scodel, Anna, and Laurèn DeMates. “From Policy to Compliance: Federal Energy Efficient Product Procurement.” 2015. LBNL-1003934. PDF

Guide to Promoting an Energy Efficient Public Sector (PePS) (2015).

This guide provides a detailed look at strategies and success stories for government action on energy efficiency. Existing buildings and new construction, purchasing policies, public infrastructure, and public transportation all provide opportunities for governments to make progress on efficiency. Further guidance is provided within the document. 

Coleman, Philip. “Guide to Promoting an Energy Efficient Public Sector (PePS).” United States Agency for International Development (USAID), 2015. 1004318. PDF

Evolution of Energy Efficiency Programs Over Time: The Case of Standby Power (2014).

This paper works to answer the question of "How we design programs over time to reflect market and technology changes, by adjusting programmatic requirements while maintaining effectiveness?" This paper discusses that question for the case of standby power, which transitioned from covering a single to multiple environmental attributes, both in the context of the program's past and future.

Payne, Christopher TH.Y. Iris Cheung, and Emily Fisher"Evolution of Energy Efficiency Programs Over Time: The Case of Standby Power." 2014 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. 2014. LBNL-6893E. PDF

Energy-Efficient Public Procurement Best Practice in Program Delivery SEAD Initiative Procurement Working Group (2013).

This paper outlines best practices for energy-efficient public procurement. 

Payne, Christopher T., Weber, Andrew R., & Semple, Abby. "Energy-Efficient Public Procurement Best Practice in Program Delivery SEAD Initiative Procurement Working Group". LBNL. 2013.

Linking Resources and Structures: Increasing the Effectiveness of Energy Efficient Government Procurement Programs (2012).

This report looks at the low compliance rates of government requirements regarding the procurement of energy-efficient products and provides points on where compliance might be improved. The report analyzes trends with implementing sustainable acquisition programs and provides a discussion on where barriers to high rates of compliance might be addressed. 

Weber, Andrew R, and Christopher T Payne. “Linking Resources and Structures: Increasing the Effectiveness of Energy Efficient Government Procurement Programs.” Berkeley: LBNL, 2012. LBNL-6190E. PDF

Achieved and Potential Energy Savings through Energy Efficient Procurement (2012).

This paper provides an in-depth analysis of potential energy savings in the federal government based on complying with federal energy efficient product requirements. The papers take a deep dive into the methodology used for the analysis and provide projections for different scenarios with varying compliance rates, at different agencies, and for different products. 

Fujita, K. Sydny, and Margaret Taylor. “Achieved and Potential Energy Savings through Energy Efficient Procurement.” Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2012. LBNL-5737E. PDF

Evidence-Based Background Material Underlying Guidance for Federal Agencies in Implementing Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans Implementing Sustainability: The Institutional-Behavioral Dimension (2011).

This paper provides guidance for federal agencies as they seek to shift towards more sustainable practices. The paper introduces the five-step framework for institutional change and how it can be applied along with the eight principles of social science for human and organizational behavior change. 

Malone, Elizabeth LTom SanquistAmy K WolfeRichard C DiamondChristopher T Payne, and Jerry Dion. “Evidence-Based Background Material Underlying Guidance for Federal Agencies in Implementing Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans Implementing Sustainability: The Institutional-Behavioral Dimension.” Oakridge National Laboratory, 2011. PDF

FEMP Contracting for Efficiency Webinar Series (2020).

This series of three webinars are broken down into topics addressing energy efficient product procurement:

Webinar 1: Introduction to Energy-Efficient Product Procurement

This webinar introduces the benefits of purchasing energy efficient products and reviews the federal requirements. 

Webinar 2: Best Practices for Energy-Efficient Contracting

This webinar walks through how to write a contract with energy efficiency requirements and provides additional information on how to ensure buyers receive energy efficient products. 

Webinar 3: Energy Efficiency in Procurement - Federal Spotlights

This webinar dives into federal case studies with speakers from different agencies talking about their experience. 

Contracting For Efficiency Comprehensive Training 

This one hour comprehensive training summarizes the three webinars in the Contracting for Efficiency Webinar series. This training will be available through the Whole Building Design Guide for Continuing education units (CEUs) in the near future.

Leveraging Procurement to Achieve Energy Savings (2019).

This presentation walks through the SO Group’s involvement with federal energy efficiency requirements, providing energy and cost saving analysis projections, and conducting research on compliance among federal agencies. 

Wang, Liyang, Chalasani, S., Morabito, M. "Leveraging Procurement to Achieve Energy Savings". Federal Environmental Symposium. 2019.

Energy-Efficient Product Procurement Training

This 1.5hr on-demand training is hosted by the Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG) and targeted towards helping agencies meet federal requirements on purchasing FEMP-designated and ENERGY STAR products. 

Participants who complete the course are eligible to receive:

IACET_Accredited_Provider.jpgFEMP IACET: 0.2 CEU

 

 

Payne, Christopher T., Sahl, Amanda. "Energy-Efficient Product Procurement". WBDG.

Sustainable Acquisition for Federal Agencies Training
 

This 2hr on-demand training is hosted by the Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG) and helps staff through the process of sustainable procurement.

Participants who complete the course are eligible to receive:

download.jpgIACET_Accredited_Provider.jpgFEMP IACET: 0.2 CEU

AIA Learning Units: 2.0 LU | HSW

USGBC GBCI: 2.0 CE LEED Category: Materials and Resources

 

Fardanesh, Shabnam, Cannon, Sandra. "Sustainable Acquisition for Federal Agencies". WBDG.

Contracting for Efficiency Training

This 2hr on-demand training is hosted by the Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG) and teaches federal buyers about energy efficient product procurement and how to achieve it in the contracting process.

Participants who complete the course are eligible to receive:

download.jpgIACET_Accredited_Provider.jpgFEMP IACET:  fbpta-qualified.jpg 0.2 CEU

AIA Learning Units: 2.0 LU | HSW

USGBC GBCI: 2.0 CE LEED Category: Materials and Resources

FBPTA Competencies: 10.3

 

Payne, Christopher T. "Contracting for Efficiency". WBDG

Contact Us
Technology Researcher II, Project Lead
Senior Research Associate
Senior Research Associate